Harvard Law School Library

Bracton Online -- English

Previous   Volume 2, Page 118  Next    

Go to Volume:      Page:    




[001] in perpetuity by the aforesaid service.’ By saying ‘I and my heirs,’ he binds to
[002] warranty himself and his heirs, near and remote, present and future, succeeding
[003] him in perpetuity. By the words ‘we will warrant,’ he takes upon himself the
[004] burden of defending in his possession of the thing given his tenant [and his heirs,
[005] or his heirs or assigns, or] his assigns and their heirs [against] all others, as was said
[006] above, if the tenement is sought by another in demesne. By saying ‘we will acquit,’
[007] he obliges himself and his heirs to acquit if anyone claims additional service or
[008] service other than that specified in the charter. By the words ‘we will defend,’ he
[009] obliges himself and his heirs to defend against anyone who seeks to impose a
[010] servitude on the thing given contrary to the form of his gift. It is not enough if he
[011] warrants the thing itself to him unless he warrants its appurtenances, whether
[012] they are corporeal or incorporeal, as a right: corporeal, as where hamlets, not
[013] physically part of the thing, belong to it;1 incorporeal, as where an advowson is
[014] appurtenant to his own property or there is a servitude in another's. A warranty
[015] may be broad or narrow. Broad, as where it is said, ‘I and my heirs will warrant
[016] to such a one and his heirs,’ Broader, as ‘to such a one and his heirs and assigns
[017] and the heirs of his assigns.’ Broadest of all, as ‘to such a one and his heirs and
[018] assigns and their heirs and the assigns of their assigns and their heirs.’ Then the
[019] donor and his heirs are bound by the modus of the gift to warrant it directly to all
[020] [such assigns and their heirs] if the thing has passed through that many hands.2
[021] But if he says, ‘We will warrant to such a one and his heirs,’ and the donee gives
[022] it over or assigns, the principal feoffor is not bound to warrant such persons directly
[023] but [only] through a mesne, that is, each may vouch his own feoffor to warranty,
[024] ascending step by step. A warranty may be narrow, as where he says, ‘to such a
[025] one and his heirs of the wife to whom he is married;’ here the warranty is restricted
[026] to the heirs expressed only and [does not extend] to others.3 Narrower still, as,
[027] ‘I and my heirs will warrant to you,’ thus excluding the heirs of the donee from
[028] the warranty. Narrowest of all, as, ‘I warrant to you,’ no mention made of the
[029] heirs of the donor or the donee. 4Though in a gift homage is done and service
[030] undertaken, by a modus placed in it [the donor] may be excused from warranting,
[031] as where he adds this to his charter of gift, that neither he nor his heirs shall be
[032] held to warrant,5 for an agreement often defeats law.6 When



Notes

1. Infra iii, 140

2. Supra 67

3. Infra iv, 219

4. New paragraph

5. Infra 148, iv, 220

6. Glanvill, x, 14


Contact: specialc@law.harvard.edu
Page last reviewed April 2003.
© 2003 The President and Fellows of Harvard College