such a place to answer the said B. regarding the confederacy and theft (or homicide,  robbery or any other felony) whereof he appeals him. (Or We order you  without delay to arrest A. and bring him before our justices etc. to answer B., a  confessed thief, concerning the confederacy in theft whereof he appeals him). And  have there before the said justices sufficient suit from such a neighbourhood to  make an inquest as to the aforesaid in accordance with the custom of our realm.  And have there this writ. Witness etc. There could well be added to this writ and  if the same A. has gone into hiding because of that appeal then cause him to be  exacted from county court to county court until he is outlawed in accordance with  the law of the land. This may1 be done at the king's suit alone, without another's  suit, because of the presumption raised by the appeal and the flight.2 When the  appellee has appeared let the approver set forth his appeal in these words:
When the appellee has appeared; how the approver should set forth his accusation and appeal.
 3A. of N., confessing that he is a thief, appeals B. of confederacy and theft (or  robbery or homicide) that is, that they together stole such a thing at such a  place, so that the aforesaid B. had so much for his share. Or thus: that they  came together to the house of such a one in such a place (or on the road or elsewhere)  and robbed him of such a thing (or robbed and slew him, and so of receiving with  knowledge and other felonies) so that the aforesaid B. had so much as his share.  And this he offers to prove against him by his body as the court may award.  The approver must describe some specific thing and all the circumstances, without  any variance or alteration, and must recognize the appellee when he is produced in  court, for if he does not it will be presumed that they never were confederates.4
The approver may appeal several; then thus:
 A. also appeals C.5 of N. of confederacy and theft and6 the felony aforesaid so that  C. had so much as his share. Or of another felony committed elsewhere. And he  may thus appeal several persons on the same day of confederacy and of several  different thefts.
Of the method of making denial.
 7And B. comes and denies the confederacy and the theft (or the robbery and  slaying, [or] the receiving) and all felony and whatever is alleged against him,  word for word and as it is alleged against him. [If] he then offers proof by his body,  without claiming
3. C.R.R., ix, 155 (the words De corona are above this entry), B.N.B. no. 1447: Johannes filius Nicholai, cognoscens se esse latronem, appellat Alexandrum de Hethe quod ipse simul cum eo furatus fuit octo equos apud Blaneford unde ipse habuit ad partem suam viginti solidos: et hoc offert probare per corpus suum, prout curia consideraverit.
7. (Continuing n. 3 supra): Et Alexander venit et defendit societatem eius et latrocinium equorum et totum de verbo in verbum per corpus suum prout etc. Consideratum est quod duellum sit inter eos, et Alexander det vadium defendendi se et Johannes probandi, plegium eorum gaola. Veniant tali die armati.