Harvard Law School Library

Bracton Online -- English

Previous   Volume 4, Page 39  Next    

Go to Volume:      Page:    

[001] while he remained in the household of the said C., who now is not of the household of
[002] the said C., as the said B. says. And unless he does so etc.’ And similarly of common of
[003] pasture, if it has been aliened and demised for a term that has passed. Let this writ
[004] then issue, provided the pasture is certain and limited to a certain number of beasts.

Writ for pasture given for a term that has passed.

[006] ‘The king to the sheriff, greeting. Order A. that rightfully etc. he render to B. common
[007] of pasture for so many oxen and so many sheep, (and so on) in such a vill which he
[008] claims is his right as appurtenant to his free tenement in such a vill, and in which the
[009] said A. has no entry except through C., whose heir the same B. is, who demised that
[010] pasture to him for a term that has passed, as he says. And unless he does so etc.’

If the parties put themselves on a jury: according to the different writs.

[012] When the demandant has put himself on an inquest and jury to prove his intentio and
[013] the tenant similarly with respect to his answer and exception, let the juries be charged
[014] in this way, according to the different kinds of writs. If for a term that has passed,1
[015] [enough has been said above on the form of inquest.] If by a husband whom a wife
[016] could not gainsay, then thus: ‘to recognize on their oath if the aforesaid tenant had
[017] any right or entry (or simply ‘any entry’) in so much land with the appurtenances in
[018] such a vill which the aforesaid claims as her right (or ‘as her right and inheritance’ or
[019] ‘as her right and maritagium’ or ‘as her dower which she had of the gift of such a one,
[020] her first husband’), other than through such a one her former husband (or ‘her second
[021] husband’ according to the form of the writ of entry) whom in his lifetime she could
[022] not gainsay, or if he had his entry in the aforesaid land through the same demandant
[023] who gave that land (or ‘sold it’) to him before her husband married her (or ‘after the
[024] death of her husband in her liege widowhood’) etc.’ When the means and form of the
[025] entry is denied, it will always be necessary to phrase the inquest disjunctively,
[026] according to the answer of the tenant who denies the entry by excepting and
[027] answering that he has an entry other than that which the demandant asserts, or a
[028] different one through another. If conversely the wife aliens the property of her
[029] husband or her own


1. Deleted

Contact: specialc@law.harvard.edu
Page last reviewed April 2003.
© 2003 The President and Fellows of Harvard College